In view of the historical events, the arrival of the Carthaginians, Arabs, Turks, French, has shown distanced compositions from the lagoon even though they often coveted to find ways to accost it. By way of entering in the waterfronts of Tunis were an embarrassment, an obstacle that limited the kind of urban development, the city legal moves farther lakes unlike that which by illegal against projects on marshy surfaces.
Improving the ecosystem baffled his back to the city; it was a pregnancy to trigger urban development projects in Tunis. The problem of the article is to show that if the presence of water was feared for the city after it became the stronghold of the city of Tunis and that reconciliation between the city of Tunis and its waterfronts was induced by three moments: the design, marketing and implementation.
Notwithstanding, we formulate the hypothesis that through probably fulfilment of the opening on the nature, idiosyncrasy on the development of space exudes an impression of openness fundamentally marked by the paradox: profitability serves him as a focus to finally reach an urban project where the lake is not felt.
The name usually given to megaprojects around waterfronts in some Arab spatialities refers in many instances to a variety of uses: some point to the importance that decision-makers attach to these projects depending on the financial or technical investment scope they impose. Some also mention the complex urban dimensions and implicit problems of city planning, in particular most of the processes that crystallize a set of multidimensional concepts including urban mobility, public spaces, developmentβ¦Other projects involve a large number of political and technical actors, require a selection of economic activities, and targeted social groups that is generally followed by spatial change of the marginalized and the undesirable.
Thus, it appears here that this term Β«megaΒ» on the one hand raises the study of the expected future effects on all social groups, environments and economic nature, and on the other hand, it questions the complementarity between the plans of the megaprojects around the waterfronts and the strategic plans of the whole city.
